Washington "Shooting" of 3 October '13:

The"Media"  reporting of the Washington "Shooting" of 3 October '13 is indeed strange, strange: All they are telling us is that a nasty shoot-up occurred this morning. Makes you think that a hoodlum or anarchist did the shooting and lots of innocent people were killed. But what is absent from their reports today is; Who-Did-What.  Included is that a police cruiser had a bad accident and that a policeman driver had to be pried out and was stable in a hospital. And that a woman driver approached a Capitol Building. That leaves a lot to the imagination. My take on it is that the lady may have challenged a Capitol barrier on protest with intention of making a scene. Then the policeman became suspicious, pursued the lady, then decided to ram her vehicle. Then his fellow officers opened fire to put her down. We'll never know the whole truth. Judging by the Police and  Federali silence -- who knows.... like Bengazi.

Hillarious

B.O. has become Soooo reminiscent of  Frank Morgan in "The WIZARD OF OZ"


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EWLeKGI0ro

           as the fool behind the curtain,

 addressing the Munchkins of OZ. 

In supporting roles, can you envision;

John Boehner as the LION,

John McCain as SCARECROW and ...

Mitch McConnel as the TIN MAN!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EWLeKGI0ro

 
Ange 

PROGRESS

The deluge of political petitions and requests for money is commenced after a brief pause after the 2012 elections. At the moment, on my dining room table I count  42 unopened envelopes of various sizes (33 regular, 7 half-page and 3 full-sized) accumulated just over the past three weeks). I opened many others; 42 linger. The themes are always about the same; petitions against various ill-doings by the administration extant and plaintiff calls for financial support by wannabee candidates. I estimate only about a half dozen valid issues. Not that they are not all well intended and in all instances absolutely correct in their innuendos, but they are NOT playing on level ground any more since 2008; likely earlier.

 Since then, millions of loose dollars are floating around in various Democratic and allied coffers as spin-off (intentional) from bailouts and QE's, ready for deployment without further solicitation. Meanwhile the Conservatives are wading in the wetlands of limited contribution restrictions. The damnable problem is that most of these solicitors and activists are uncoordinated. Now the Democrats have managed to inspire a squabble between rino's and tea-partiers. About a half-dozen critical issue treated by all of them, the most significant is the "birth certificate" issue, which I have known since 2009 to be real, valid and in immediate need of execution. But where is the coordinated Prime Mover. Is it Corso, is it Arpeo? Is it the GOP (it should be the leader)? All are pushing, but not in the same direction or at the same speed.

The push for Conservative integration is not happening. Until that happens we Conservatives are assured of going nowhere, but at great expense regardless, just as if it were.

Gentlemen, Start your, Engines.........

IF YOU PLEASE, SIRS.

"INTENT"

The Administration's rosy contentment with "employment" and "economy" numbers, contrast with Conservative Dismay. This stems from  the real fact that the Liberal intent is NOT to advance the economy for all as much as it is to advance the strength and prosperity of just the Regents now in power. This includes all the King's Men, their Union supporters and numerous wealthy exponents. Any prosperity beyond just that is "money left on the table", to be consigned instead to said regents, preferably in perpetuity. This is NOT the Constitutional Republic formed in 1789.

How did We get here? I say, it's due to a poorly formed and poorly informed present day electorate.

As cavalier as it seems, there are four things that must be done for this electorate to save the USA:

Advance the voting age to 25.

Learn, speak and write Basic English.

Profess and Pledge Allegiance to the USA and its flag.

Require Voter Identification.

Recent Media innuendos that moves to impeach BO are "out of line", or "ill advised". The Media always sounds as though they are objective, but viewed overall, said innuendos ring true only for the Liberal perspective. In other words, impeachment is ill advised for the Democratic Party (surprise). But what about the rest of our country?

This is true for virtually all comments volunteered by our very active media. i.e., what's sauce for the goose... well... is sauce for the goose..... really?... Imagine that!

I find that when I fit that filter on various media comments, they all ring the same... What's "bad" is really just bad for the Liberals, and what's "good" about a news item is good only for the Democrats.

Conservatives?..... Who?   

Media

That the recent teen age violence is racially tainted and now clearly includes black on white more than vice versa is evident. Overt killing for pleasure and self aggrandizement has arisen. The fact that the Media largely ignores black on black and black on white crime signifies Bias on the part of said Media. And it covers up a serious societal problem so as to imply that they (Media) endorse that crime. This becomes more clear when such Media rise in fierce defense of blacks that appear to suffer at the hands of a white person who acts in justified self-defense against them. Although in the short run, they (Media) achieve an immediate goal of promoting these that they protect, in the long run this creates a population of scofflaws and ne'er-do-wells that will Not adjust to society, leading such to a life of contention, imprisonment and discontent. In the long run, no one will want to live in a society so promoted (to wit; Detroit). Biblical recounting of the complete destruction of such malevolent societies abound. See Jeremiah 7:30-32, 8:11-12,  9:3; there are more. Is this situation to be desired or even tolerated. What's the answer, I ask you?

I'm always impressed that I have been alive for fully one-third of this country's existence. When I was a tyke, the population here was 135 million. Now it's over doubled!. Then World War 2 came and went. Green or khaki men civilian clothes were not to be seen for many years afterward.

My first shock along the way was circa 1952 when the Swedish wife of an acquaintance casually noted that Swedish families with children were given government allowances for raising them! Unheard of here then.

Fast forward to Kennedy,immediately succeeded by Johnson who started the impossible "war on poverty" which only exacerbated the problem.  The 1960's also erupted a social upheaval.

Then the gasoline shock of 1974 came; we were aghast. In previous decades and especially all through WWII, The USA was an EXPORTER of gasoline and oil, but no more. The 1970's also lit the flame of accepted inflation. I noted that a distinct inflation-mentality ("it will always cost more next year") now persisted routinely in everyone's mind.

We are seeing the manifestation of ALL these trends in the present Liberal administrations campaigns for "Change". To me, this governmental tyrannical intent is to deliberately impress new laws and regulations aimed at making government the primary mover and shaker, for the convenience of that government, for its Regents, and without any support from the general population except their knee-jerk vote during elections.

Our Constitution was written circa 1790 to deny said government the opportunity to do so. Study of the Federalists Papers (http://campanellaacoustics.com/ange/Fedpsort.htm) reveals grave concern by Madison, Jay and Hamilton that the Regency of government might tyrannically deprive USA citizens of one or more of their inalienable (e.g. guns) rights. The sad, sad fact today is the intransigence of our Congress and especially the House, about doing anything about said tyranny. Many of our Congressmen are now AWOL regarding their pledge to uphold the Constitution. Congress must now redress this wrong.